From: | Selena Deckelmann <selena(at)endpoint(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)endpoint(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d |
Date: | 2009-03-09 18:31:18 |
Message-ID: | 49B56076.6040909@endpoint.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Greg Sabino Mullane<greg(at)endpoint(dot)com> writes:
>> The solution I came up with is to use a new letter, -I, and to deprecate -d by
>> having it throw an exception when used.
>
> "Deprecate" does not mean "break".
This '-d' thing is more than just a matter of reading the documentation.
Our other command line utilities lead a person to assume (logically)
that '-d' means something completely apart from what it actually does.
I've made this mistake, so have most other sysadmins I know.
While this change may break existing scripts, the result is that future
users of Postgres will have a much less painful experience if they
accidentally try to use that option.
-selena
--
Selena Deckelmann
End Point Corporation
selena(at)endpoint(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-03-09 19:00:46 | Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1704) |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2009-03-09 18:14:40 | Re: Prepping to break every past release... |