| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Prepping to break every past release... |
| Date: | 2009-03-09 18:14:40 |
| Message-ID: | 1236622480.4649.38.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 13:59 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> If this is the worst inconsistency you can find in our system tables
> after +20 years of development, I feel pretty good.
I was using a single example. This would be a large project I am sure
and of course we should feel good. In all I would say we are likely one
of the more consistent pieces of software in terms of our age. That
doesn't mean we shouldn't try to continue to improve.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake(at)jabber(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Selena Deckelmann | 2009-03-09 18:31:18 | Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2009-03-09 18:13:34 | Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d |