Re: status of remaining patches

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: status of remaining patches
Date: 2009-03-08 19:09:42
Message-ID: 49B417F6.7080005@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom,

> I don't think this one is that far away either. I've been holding Bryce
> and Ramon's feet to the fire on the issue of possible downside, but so
> far there's not really much evidence of any *actual* as opposed to
> theoretical downside.

What sorts of operations would we test which could potentially show a
performance downside? I have to admit I don't really understand what
use-cases this patch is meant to improve.

--Josh

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2009-03-08 19:14:44 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid MSVC breakage caused by my previous commit by not using a
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2009-03-08 19:07:50 Re: status of remaining patches