From: | Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SYNONYMs revisited |
Date: | 2009-03-04 15:41:01 |
Message-ID: | 49AEA10D.7010901@cybertec.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua Tolley wrote:
> Way back in this thread[1] one of the arguments against allowing
> some version of CREATE SYNONYM was that we couldn't create a synonym for
> an object in a remote database. Will the SQL/MED work make this sort of
> thing a possibility? I realize since it's not standard anyway, there's
> still a discussion or two to be had about how precisely it should work,
> but thought I'd raise the possibility.
>
> - Josh / eggyknap
>
> [1] http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-03/msg00085.php
>
I still think that this is a useful feature.
If i remember correctly there were two killer arguments against this:
- it encourages people to do "lousy development"
- extra overhead
personally i think that this won't be revisted - i cannot see a real
connection to SQL/MED here.
best regards,
hans
--
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
PostgreSQL Support, Consulting, Training
www.postgresql-support.de
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-03-04 16:03:19 | Re: building pg_dump doesn't work |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-03-04 15:37:14 | Re: building pg_dump doesn't work |