From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: building pg_dump doesn't work |
Date: | 2009-03-04 16:03:19 |
Message-ID: | 20090304160319.GI12851@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> /*
>> + * We don't want to include the gram.h file on frontend builds, except ECPG, so
>> + * leave out the second struct member in that case.
>> + */
>> + #if !defined FRONTEND || defined ECPG_COMPILE
>> + #define PG_KEYWORD(a,b,c) {a,b,c}
>> + #else
>> + #define PG_KEYWORD(a,b,c) {a,c}
>> + #endif
>
> Doesn't that put 'c' into the wrong field in ScanKeyword struct? It only
> compiles because both 'value' and 'category' are int16.
No, because I had the header with the second field omitted too.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-03-04 16:11:18 | Re: building pg_dump doesn't work |
Previous Message | Hans-Jürgen Schönig | 2009-03-04 15:41:01 | Re: SYNONYMs revisited |