From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Which installation parts are backward compatible? |
Date: | 2009-02-13 09:01:30 |
Message-ID: | 499536EA.4000102@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera escreveu:
>> Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
>>> Peter Eisentraut escreveu:
>>>> If no such list exists yet, perhaps we can complete the above one, document
>>>> it, and pass it on to the packagers.
>>>>
>>> Are you suggesting that if an user has 7.4 and install 8.3 then the package
>>> will replace psql-7.4 with psql-8.3? It will confuse users more that help them
>>> (psql --version ?) and we will have extra effort to maintain the compatibility
>>> version list at each binary.
>> psql is already compatible with old versions. I don't think we should
>> throw away that work by not maintaining it.
>>
> I think we shouldn't too. But I think newbie users will be confused when (s)he
> doesn't find the exact binary version at her/his machine.
Newbie users aren't exactly the target audience for a multiversion
installation. And the slightly-past-newbie-users might find the
hypothetical "this version of psql supports servers 7.4 through 8.4"
notice in the man page or version output helpful.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-02-13 09:06:52 | Re: Which installation parts are backward compatible? |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-02-13 08:58:42 | Re: Which installation parts are backward compatible? |