From: | Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Which installation parts are backward compatible? |
Date: | 2009-02-12 15:43:09 |
Message-ID: | 4994438D.70300@timbira.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera escreveu:
> Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
>> Peter Eisentraut escreveu:
>>> If no such list exists yet, perhaps we can complete the above one, document
>>> it, and pass it on to the packagers.
>>>
>> Are you suggesting that if an user has 7.4 and install 8.3 then the package
>> will replace psql-7.4 with psql-8.3? It will confuse users more that help them
>> (psql --version ?) and we will have extra effort to maintain the compatibility
>> version list at each binary.
>
> psql is already compatible with old versions. I don't think we should
> throw away that work by not maintaining it.
>
I think we shouldn't too. But I think newbie users will be confused when (s)he
doesn't find the exact binary version at her/his machine.
--
Euler Taveira de Oliveira
http://www.timbira.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-02-12 15:44:59 | Re: some questions about SELECT FOR UPDATE/SHARE |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-02-12 15:41:01 | pg_restore --multi-thread |