Re: Which installation parts are backward compatible?

From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Which installation parts are backward compatible?
Date: 2009-02-12 15:43:09
Message-ID: 4994438D.70300@timbira.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera escreveu:
> Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
>> Peter Eisentraut escreveu:
>>> If no such list exists yet, perhaps we can complete the above one, document
>>> it, and pass it on to the packagers.
>>>
>> Are you suggesting that if an user has 7.4 and install 8.3 then the package
>> will replace psql-7.4 with psql-8.3? It will confuse users more that help them
>> (psql --version ?) and we will have extra effort to maintain the compatibility
>> version list at each binary.
>
> psql is already compatible with old versions. I don't think we should
> throw away that work by not maintaining it.
>
I think we shouldn't too. But I think newbie users will be confused when (s)he
doesn't find the exact binary version at her/his machine.

--
Euler Taveira de Oliveira
http://www.timbira.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-02-12 15:44:59 Re: some questions about SELECT FOR UPDATE/SHARE
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-02-12 15:41:01 pg_restore --multi-thread