| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: LIMIT NULL |
| Date: | 2009-02-03 21:30:27 |
| Message-ID: | 4988B773.1040001@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Feb 3, 2009, at 8:40 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>> We have one page per main SQL verb (e.g. SELECT or CREATE TABLE). I
>> don't think we want to break it up more than that. One page for each
>> clause would be a nightmare to maintain.
>
> Then should the LIMIT/OFFSET page go away?
>
>
I was referring to the reference section. I see you were referring to
the more descriptive but probably less complete Section II.
I see Section II says at the beginning: "Readers looking for a complete
description of a particular command should look into Part VI
<http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/reference.html>.".
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rick Vernam | 2009-02-03 21:31:11 | Re: LIMIT NULL |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-02-03 21:06:27 | Re: LIMIT NULL |