Re: LIMIT NULL

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: LIMIT NULL
Date: 2009-02-03 21:37:59
Message-ID: 0537CE75-9CFC-4D59-A748-E15588BF2CEE@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Feb 3, 2009, at 1:30 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:

> I was referring to the reference section. I see you were referring
> to the more descriptive but probably less complete Section II.

Yes.

> I see Section II says at the beginning: "Readers looking for a
> complete description of a particular command should look into Part
> VI <http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/reference.html>.".

Yes, but not on the page for the command, FWIW, which one often
reaches by doing a search on "LIMIT". Finding that page via search, I
would assume that it was comprehensive.

The division between what's documented in section II and what's in
section VI seems a but fuzzy, neh?

Best,

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2009-02-03 22:55:53 Re: LIMIT NULL
Previous Message Rick Vernam 2009-02-03 21:31:11 Re: LIMIT NULL