| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: LIMIT NULL |
| Date: | 2009-02-03 16:40:15 |
| Message-ID: | 4988736F.4080001@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
David E. Wheeler wrote:
>
> Heh. Okay. Well, should there be a separate LIMIT/OFFSET documentation
> page? Why have this stuff in two places? I had assumed that the
> LIMIT/OFFSET page would have all the specifies on these clauses, and
> that the SELECT page (which is kind of overwhelming as it is) would
> refer to it…
>
>
We have one page per main SQL verb (e.g. SELECT or CREATE TABLE). I
don't think we want to break it up more than that. One page for each
clause would be a nightmare to maintain.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2009-02-03 16:42:30 | Re: LIMIT NULL |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-02-03 16:39:54 | Re: add_path optimization |