| From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: LIMIT NULL |
| Date: | 2009-02-03 16:29:06 |
| Message-ID: | 092C1B1D-2A7A-40D6-BFA7-64494470E748@kineticode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Feb 2, 2009, at 1:52 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> We don't really have space to document every little niggling
>>> detail in
>>> two places; if we did that, the main docs would become unreadably
>>> dense.
>>
>> What, disk space? What do you mean by "space"?
>
> Brain space.
Heh. Okay. Well, should there be a separate LIMIT/OFFSET documentation
page? Why have this stuff in two places? I had assumed that the LIMIT/
OFFSET page would have all the specifies on these clauses, and that
the SELECT page (which is kind of overwhelming as it is) would refer
to it…
Thanks,
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-02-03 16:39:54 | Re: add_path optimization |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-02-03 16:27:27 | Re: add_path optimization |