Re: DTrace probes patch

From: Robert Lor <Robert(dot)Lor(at)Sun(dot)COM>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: DTrace probes patch
Date: 2008-12-17 17:15:51
Message-ID: 494933C7.6020203@sun.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Fujii Masao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 4:53 AM, Robert Lor <Robert(dot)Lor(at)sun(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> @@ -1313,12 +1318,14 @@ AdvanceXLInsertBuffer(bool new_segment)
>> * Have to write buffers while holding insert
>> lock. This is
>> * not good, so only write as much as we
>> absolutely must.
>> */
>> + TRACE_POSTGRESQL_WAL_BUFFER_WRITE_START();
>> WriteRqst.Write = OldPageRqstPtr;
>> WriteRqst.Flush.xlogid = 0;
>> WriteRqst.Flush.xrecoff = 0;
>> XLogWrite(WriteRqst, false, false);
>> LWLockRelease(WALWriteLock);
>> Insert->LogwrtResult = LogwrtResult;
>> + TRACE_POSTGRESQL_WAL_BUFFER_WRITE_DONE();
>>
>
> Why is TRACE_POSTGRESQL_WAL_BUFFER_WRITE_START/DONE called
> only in AdvanceXLInsertBuffer? We can trace only a part of WAL buffer write?
>
>
The intention of these probes is to determine if wal_buffers is too
small by monitoring how frequent the server has to write out the buffers
along with the I/O time.

-Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-12-17 17:25:50 Re: DTrace probes patch
Previous Message Michael Meskes 2008-12-17 16:55:35 Re: Looking for someone with MinGW