From: | Robert Lor <Robert(dot)Lor(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
---|---|
To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: DTrace probes patch |
Date: | 2008-12-17 17:15:51 |
Message-ID: | 494933C7.6020203@sun.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Fujii Masao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 4:53 AM, Robert Lor <Robert(dot)Lor(at)sun(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> @@ -1313,12 +1318,14 @@ AdvanceXLInsertBuffer(bool new_segment)
>> * Have to write buffers while holding insert
>> lock. This is
>> * not good, so only write as much as we
>> absolutely must.
>> */
>> + TRACE_POSTGRESQL_WAL_BUFFER_WRITE_START();
>> WriteRqst.Write = OldPageRqstPtr;
>> WriteRqst.Flush.xlogid = 0;
>> WriteRqst.Flush.xrecoff = 0;
>> XLogWrite(WriteRqst, false, false);
>> LWLockRelease(WALWriteLock);
>> Insert->LogwrtResult = LogwrtResult;
>> + TRACE_POSTGRESQL_WAL_BUFFER_WRITE_DONE();
>>
>
> Why is TRACE_POSTGRESQL_WAL_BUFFER_WRITE_START/DONE called
> only in AdvanceXLInsertBuffer? We can trace only a part of WAL buffer write?
>
>
The intention of these probes is to determine if wal_buffers is too
small by monitoring how frequent the server has to write out the buffers
along with the I/O time.
-Robert
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-12-17 17:25:50 | Re: DTrace probes patch |
Previous Message | Michael Meskes | 2008-12-17 16:55:35 | Re: Looking for someone with MinGW |