| From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Support a wildcard in backtrace_functions |
| Date: | 2025-02-18 12:29:27 |
| Message-ID: | 49358C71-DF9C-49EE-B768-C05CA469F9AD@yesql.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 18 Feb 2025, at 09:34, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 at 12:43, Jelte Fennema-Nio <me(at)jeltef(dot)nl> wrote:
>> Attached is a rebased patchset of my previous proposal, including a
>> few changes that Michael preferred:
>
> Rebased again. (got notified because of the new commitfest rebase emails)
We typically avoid having intra-depencies between multiple GUCs to control a
single behavior like this. I'm not sure having three is the right move here
but I need to do some more review and testing.
> The first patch should be trivial to commit at least as it's just cleanup.
Agreed, I've applied that to keep it from getting lost in here.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2025-02-18 12:29:48 | Re: Should heapam_estimate_rel_size consider fillfactor? |
| Previous Message | Zhang Mingli | 2025-02-18 12:11:22 | Re: Fix outdated code comments in nodeAgg.c |