Re: pg_settings.enumval as array

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_settings.enumval as array
Date: 2008-11-21 18:50:01
Message-ID: 492702D9.5090600@hagander.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Also, the output datatype should be text[] not cstring[].
>
>> Ok, will change. That requires hardcode of 1009? Or should I a #define
>> to pg_type.h?
>
> Add a #define (bit surprising we didn't have one already)

Yeah, that surprised me too - which is why I had to ask (in case there
was some strange reason we didn't want it).

Changed and applied. Thanks for your comments!

//Magnus

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2008-11-21 18:51:05 Re: Autoconf, libpq and replacement function
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-11-21 18:49:34 Re: Autoconf, libpq and replacement function