Re: Min Xid problem proposal

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Min Xid problem proposal
Date: 2005-12-09 19:08:55
Message-ID: 492.1134155335@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Ok, so I shall go back to the original patch, which did exactly this.
> Is it OK for applying?

I haven't looked at it ... when did you post it exactly?

> (I'm using RecentXmin instead of current XID though, because a
> currently-running transaction could insert tuples in the table I just
> vacuumed.)

Duh, right.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-12-09 19:17:22 Re: Log of CREATE USER statement
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-12-09 19:07:43 Re: Log of CREATE USER statement