Re: Min Xid problem proposal

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Min Xid problem proposal
Date: 2005-12-09 19:19:39
Message-ID: 20051209191939.GB27670@surnet.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > Ok, so I shall go back to the original patch, which did exactly this.
> > Is it OK for applying?
>
> I haven't looked at it ... when did you post it exactly?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 23:40:52 -0300
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Per-table freeze limit proposal

I have a version that applies cleanly to current CVS tip. Do I post it
again?

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Qingqing Zhou 2005-12-09 19:20:57 Re: Warm-cache prefetching
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-12-09 19:17:22 Re: Log of CREATE USER statement