Yes, 'warm standby' was what I intended to write. This must have been
some kind of wishful thinking. ;)
But I'd really appreciate 'hot standby' in a future version of postgres.
Marc
Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 5:50 AM, Marc Schablewski <ms(at)clickware(dot)de> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> we are running a PostgreSQL 8.3.3 on a Linux box (SuSE 10.3, 2.6.22
>> kernel) as a hot standby. After some maintenances work the WAL files
>>
>
> I'm assuming you meant 'warm standby'...hot standby servers can be
> served for queries. This feature is proposed for PostgreSQL 8.4
>
> merlin
>
>
>