From: | Marc Schablewski <ms(at)clickware(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Hot standby stops after a few days of inactivity (i.e. no new WAL) |
Date: | 2008-11-04 14:05:47 |
Message-ID: | 491056BB.2080400@clickware.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Ah, ok. I somehow missed the first line of the message an the rest of it
left the impression that "something" must be wrong with replication.
I guess one of my colleagues might have shut down the database by
accident and forgot to tell me.
Anyway, thanks for your reply.
Marc
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Marc Schablewski wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> we are running a PostgreSQL 8.3.3 on a Linux box (SuSE 10.3, 2.6.22
>> kernel) as a hot standby. After some maintenances work the WAL files
>> couldn't be shipped to that system (which had nothing to do with
>> postgres, as we found out later). The problem was not noticed for about
>> a week. When looking for a reason why the WAL weren't shipped, we found
>> the following error message:
>>
>> 2008-10-31 17:07:52 CET 9162LOG: received smart shutdown request
>> 2008-10-31 17:07:52 CET 9178FATAL: could not restore file
>> "000000010000008600000018" from archive: return code 15
>>
>
> This server was stopped intentionally by someone or something, external
> to Postgres itself. "Smart shutdown" means the postmaster got SIGTERM.
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc Schablewski | 2008-11-04 14:19:00 | Re: Hot standby stops after a few days of inactivity (i.e. no new WAL) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-11-04 13:44:53 | Re: Hot standby stops after a few days of inactivity (i.e. no new WAL) |