From: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)tocr(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kevin Murphy <murphy(at)genome(dot)chop(dot)edu>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Drupal and PostgreSQL - performance issues? |
Date: | 2008-10-15 18:10:56 |
Message-ID: | 48F63230.1070208@tocr.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
Tom Lane wrote:
> I think the subtext there is that the Linux kernel hackers hate the SysV
> IPC APIs and wish they'd go away. They are presently constrained from
> removing 'em by their desire for POSIX compliance, but you won't get
> them to make any changes that might result in those APIs becoming more
> widely used :-(
>
> Mind you, I find the SysV APIs uselessly baroque too, but there is one
> feature that we have to have that is not in mmap(): the ability to
> detect other processes attached to a shmem block.
Didn't we solve this problem on Windows? Can we do a similar thing in
Unix and get ride of the SysV stuff?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-10-15 18:15:10 | Re: Drupal and PostgreSQL - performance issues? |
Previous Message | Andrus | 2008-10-15 18:07:28 | Re: Optimizing projections containing unused columns |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-10-15 18:15:10 | Re: Drupal and PostgreSQL - performance issues? |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2008-10-15 17:22:14 | Re: Backup strategies |