From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)tocr(dot)com> |
Cc: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kevin Murphy <murphy(at)genome(dot)chop(dot)edu>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Drupal and PostgreSQL - performance issues? |
Date: | 2008-10-15 18:15:10 |
Message-ID: | 24873.1224094510@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
"Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew(at)tocr(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Mind you, I find the SysV APIs uselessly baroque too, but there is one
>> feature that we have to have that is not in mmap(): the ability to
>> detect other processes attached to a shmem block.
> Didn't we solve this problem on Windows?
Not terribly well --- see active thread on -hackers.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2008-10-15 18:25:28 | Re: UPDATE and Indexes and Performance |
Previous Message | Matthew T. O'Connor | 2008-10-15 18:10:56 | Re: Drupal and PostgreSQL - performance issues? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-10-15 19:28:59 | Re: Drupal and PostgreSQL - performance issues? |
Previous Message | Matthew T. O'Connor | 2008-10-15 18:10:56 | Re: Drupal and PostgreSQL - performance issues? |