From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
Cc: | Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] v7.3.1 Bundled and Released ... |
Date: | 2003-01-05 01:10:19 |
Message-ID: | 4873.1041729019@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-announce pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> I never considered tag'ng for minor releases as having any importance,
> since the tarball's themselves provide the 'tag' ... branches give us the
> ability to back-patch, but tag's don't provide us anything ... do they?
Well, a tag makes it feasible for someone else to recreate the tarball,
given access to the CVS server. Dunno how important that is in the real
world --- but I have seen requests before for us to tag release points.
Any other arguments out there?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dan Langille | 2003-01-05 12:41:37 | Re: [GENERAL] v7.3.1 Bundled and Released ... |
Previous Message | Larry Rosenman | 2003-01-05 01:08:20 | Re: [GENERAL] v7.3.1 Bundled and Released ... |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Justin Clift | 2003-01-05 09:22:02 | Which 4GL application development tools are available? |
Previous Message | Larry Rosenman | 2003-01-05 01:08:20 | Re: [GENERAL] v7.3.1 Bundled and Released ... |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2003-01-05 01:11:27 | Re: New Portal in Place, DNS switched ... |
Previous Message | Larry Rosenman | 2003-01-05 01:08:20 | Re: [GENERAL] v7.3.1 Bundled and Released ... |