From: | Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] v7.3.1 Bundled and Released ... |
Date: | 2003-01-05 12:41:37 |
Message-ID: | 20030105074055.P8398-100000@m20.unixathome.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-announce pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> > I never considered tag'ng for minor releases as having any importance,
> > since the tarball's themselves provide the 'tag' ... branches give us the
> > ability to back-patch, but tag's don't provide us anything ... do they?
>
> Well, a tag makes it feasible for someone else to recreate the tarball,
> given access to the CVS server. Dunno how important that is in the real
> world --- but I have seen requests before for us to tag release points.
FWIW, in the real world, a release doesn't happen if it's not taqged.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Copeland | 2003-01-05 14:53:25 | Re: [GENERAL] v7.3.1 Bundled and Released ... |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-01-05 01:10:19 | Re: [GENERAL] v7.3.1 Bundled and Released ... |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Markus Bengts | 2003-01-05 13:34:25 | chkpass |
Previous Message | Timur Irmatov | 2003-01-05 11:20:09 | foreign key locks |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Justin Clift | 2003-01-05 13:21:51 | Re: New Portal in Place, DNS switched ... |
Previous Message | Peter Mount | 2003-01-05 12:27:47 | Re: New Portal in Place, DNS switched ... |