| From: | "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum" <adsmail(at)wars-nicht(dot)de>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2008-06-10 10:03:08 |
| Message-ID: | 484E515C.5060309@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Gregory Stark wrote:
> Instead of zeroing bytes and depending on compression why not just pass an
> extra parameter to the archive command with the offset to the logical end of
> data.
Because the archiver process doesn't have that information.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2008-06-10 16:01:05 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-06-10 09:43:51 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-06-10 10:10:18 | Re: Overhauling GUCS |
| Previous Message | 汪琦 | 2008-06-10 09:50:03 | why copy tuple in the end of trigger when nothing changed in NEW, OLD record variable |