| From: | "Jignesh K(dot) Shah" <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, Thomas Burdairon <tburdairon(at)entelience(dot)com>, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work |
| Date: | 2008-05-29 03:22:34 |
| Message-ID: | 483E217A.7090903@sun.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jignesh K. Shah" <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)Sun(dot)COM> writes:
>
>> Are there any head fixes proposed for it?
>>
>
> It's been fixed in CVS for a month. We just haven't pushed a release yet.
>
Let me try it out and see what I find out in my EAStress workload.
Regards,
Jignesh
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Koichi Suzuki | 2008-05-29 03:28:15 | Re: intercepting WAL writes |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-05-29 03:19:45 | Re: Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Paul Lindner | 2008-06-02 08:57:37 | Postgresql JDBC UTF8 Conversion Throughput |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-05-29 03:19:45 | Re: Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work |