| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jignesh K(dot) Shah" <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
| Cc: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, Thomas Burdairon <tburdairon(at)entelience(dot)com>, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work |
| Date: | 2008-05-29 03:19:45 |
| Message-ID: | 14634.1212031185@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
"Jignesh K. Shah" <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)Sun(dot)COM> writes:
> Are there any head fixes proposed for it?
It's been fixed in CVS for a month. We just haven't pushed a release yet.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jignesh K. Shah | 2008-05-29 03:22:34 | Re: Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work |
| Previous Message | Jignesh K. Shah | 2008-05-29 03:13:12 | Re: Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jignesh K. Shah | 2008-05-29 03:22:34 | Re: Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work |
| Previous Message | Jignesh K. Shah | 2008-05-29 03:13:12 | Re: Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work |