| From: | laser <laserlist(at)pgsqldb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: is it a bug in rule system? |
| Date: | 2008-05-28 08:59:33 |
| Message-ID: | 483D1EF5.7040409@pgsqldb.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
A. Kretschmer wrote:
> am Wed, dem 28.05.2008, um 15:56:22 +0800 mailte laser folgendes:
>
>> hi all,
>>
>> see query below:
>>
>> create table ruleTest(id integer, name text);
>>
>> create or replace rule ruleTest_insert_rule AS on insert to ruleTest
>> where exists(select 1 from ruleTest where ruleTest.name = NEW.name)
>> do instead (update ruleTest set id = id+1 where ruleTest.name = NEW.name);
>>
>> I think the id should be 1, cause the rule condition should only affect
>> exist row,
>> but ISTM the rule act like a DO ALSO rule: insert the row first, then
>> update it.
>>
>> any hints?
>>
>
> Yes, use a TRIGGER instead a RULE for such tasks.
>
>
thanks, good to know it's a bug and we'll try TRIGGER approach.
thanks and best regards
-laser
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2008-05-28 11:14:19 | Re: is it a bug in rule system? |
| Previous Message | Kaloyan Iliev | 2008-05-28 08:30:46 | Re: Open Source CRM - Options? |