| From: | "A(dot) Kretschmer" <andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: is it a bug in rule system? |
| Date: | 2008-05-28 08:28:25 |
| Message-ID: | 20080528082825.GA25117@a-kretschmer.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
am Wed, dem 28.05.2008, um 15:56:22 +0800 mailte laser folgendes:
> hi all,
>
> see query below:
>
> create table ruleTest(id integer, name text);
>
> create or replace rule ruleTest_insert_rule AS on insert to ruleTest
> where exists(select 1 from ruleTest where ruleTest.name = NEW.name)
> do instead (update ruleTest set id = id+1 where ruleTest.name = NEW.name);
>
> I think the id should be 1, cause the rule condition should only affect
> exist row,
> but ISTM the rule act like a DO ALSO rule: insert the row first, then
> update it.
>
> any hints?
Yes, use a TRIGGER instead a RULE for such tasks.
Andreas
--
Andreas Kretschmer
Kontakt: Heynitz: 035242/47150, D1: 0160/7141639 (mehr: -> Header)
GnuPG-ID: 0x3FFF606C, privat 0x7F4584DA http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kaloyan Iliev | 2008-05-28 08:30:46 | Re: Open Source CRM - Options? |
| Previous Message | laser | 2008-05-28 07:56:22 | is it a bug in rule system? |