Re: is it a bug in rule system?

From: "A(dot) Kretschmer" <andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: is it a bug in rule system?
Date: 2008-05-28 08:28:25
Message-ID: 20080528082825.GA25117@a-kretschmer.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

am Wed, dem 28.05.2008, um 15:56:22 +0800 mailte laser folgendes:
> hi all,
>
> see query below:
>
> create table ruleTest(id integer, name text);
>
> create or replace rule ruleTest_insert_rule AS on insert to ruleTest
> where exists(select 1 from ruleTest where ruleTest.name = NEW.name)
> do instead (update ruleTest set id = id+1 where ruleTest.name = NEW.name);
>
> I think the id should be 1, cause the rule condition should only affect
> exist row,
> but ISTM the rule act like a DO ALSO rule: insert the row first, then
> update it.
>
> any hints?

Yes, use a TRIGGER instead a RULE for such tasks.

Andreas
--
Andreas Kretschmer
Kontakt: Heynitz: 035242/47150, D1: 0160/7141639 (mehr: -> Header)
GnuPG-ID: 0x3FFF606C, privat 0x7F4584DA http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kaloyan Iliev 2008-05-28 08:30:46 Re: Open Source CRM - Options?
Previous Message laser 2008-05-28 07:56:22 is it a bug in rule system?