| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Execution-time-sensitive timestamp regression tests |
| Date: | 2008-05-23 22:47:29 |
| Message-ID: | 48374981.5060207@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>
>> And I agree that it's strange we haven't seen it before. Could it be a
>> side-effect from something that happened lately, or should we consider
>> it purely random?
>>
>
> Well, it's possible we have seen it before and ignored it because it
> wasn't reproducible. It was only the coincidence of two buildfarm
> members showing the failure at the same time that drew my attention.
>
> I think Andrew has the ability to grep the buildfarm history to see
> if we've seen this before.
>
> Another possibility is that we did something that improved performance
> to get us below the threshold where this could happen; though I don't
> recall anything very likely.
>
> rega
>
I can't find any other similar failures recently in the buildfarm history.
One data point: the _bat buildfarm members are running on Windows under
VMWare, so their clocks might not be very true.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Meskes | 2008-05-23 23:15:16 | keyword list/ecpg |
| Previous Message | Vishal Mailinglist | 2008-05-23 21:34:30 | Re: Error while executing pg_dump "invalid memory alloc request size 4294967293" |