From: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | keyword list/ecpg |
Date: | 2008-05-23 23:15:16 |
Message-ID: | 20080523231516.GB31004@feivel.credativ.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
I recently (on my flight to Ottawa) changed ecpg to use the keyword list
of the backend instead of its own. This means that there is one less
file to sync manually. However, it also means that an additional keyword
defined in the backend will break compilation as ecpg doesn't have this
definition in its parser.
Does anyone object to moving the symbol definition part to a file of its
own that's inluded by both parser? Or does anyone have a better idea?
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes(at)jabber(dot)org
Go VfL Borussia! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-05-24 00:20:31 | \df displaying volatility |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-05-23 22:47:29 | Re: Execution-time-sensitive timestamp regression tests |