Re: PG -v- MySQL

From: cyclix <cyclix(at)optusnet(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Gauthier, Dave" <dave(dot)gauthier(at)intel(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PG -v- MySQL
Date: 2008-05-14 11:03:58
Message-ID: 482AC71E.4020208@optusnet.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


It surely rocks. We switched from MySql to PostgreSQL about a year ago
and have never looked back, we are happy as Larry. A bit more
information on our web site.

http://www.alerce.com.au

Regards,

Mario

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Scott Marlowe wrote:
>> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>>> Here are some other things we have v. mysql:
>>> *) Transactional DDL: much safer and easier to roll out changes to
>>> 24/7 systems
>
>> And I totally agree with everything you said Merlin. Especially about
>> the community.
>>
>
> In short, we rock. :P
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karsten Hilbert 2008-05-14 13:15:56 ranked subqueries vs distinct question
Previous Message ludwig 2008-05-14 10:42:25 Re: Underscore "_" in LIKE pattern