Re: PG -v- MySQL

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Gauthier, Dave" <dave(dot)gauthier(at)intel(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PG -v- MySQL
Date: 2008-05-13 16:16:56
Message-ID: 4829BEF8.3050205@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Here are some other things we have v. mysql:
>> *) Transactional DDL: much safer and easier to roll out changes to 24/7 systems

> And I totally agree with everything you said Merlin. Especially about
> the community.
>

In short, we rock. :P

Joshua D. Drake

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-05-13 16:18:35 Re: pg_standby / WAL archive-restore through system restarts
Previous Message Fernando Schapachnik 2008-05-13 16:16:03 Re: Is this a bug? (changing sequences in default value)