From: | Dragan Zubac <zubac(at)vlayko(dot)tv> |
---|---|
To: | Rob Collins <rob(dot)list(at)agiledata(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Master-master replication with PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2008-04-16 14:52:16 |
Message-ID: | 480612A0.9050508@vlayko.tv |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hello
http://www.postgresql.at/english/pr_cybercluster_e.html
didn't test it myself though
Sincerely
Dragan
Rob Collins wrote:
> Hello Dimitri
>
> To clarify the requirement: much like you, we're not looking for
> synchronous replication, which would be too slow. The branches and
> central server can be different for about 5 to 10 minutes. But the
> branches need to be able to function independently if the network or
> central goes down. Londiste looks interesting, though the
> documentation seems a bit sparse. Is it really that simple to set up,
> or is there a fair amount of trial and error in the setup process?
>
> Best wishes
>
> Rob
>
> On 16/04/2008, *Dimitri Fontaine* <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com
> <mailto:dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Le mercredi 16 avril 2008, Rob Collins a écrit :
>
> > There is one central server with 19 branches. Some tables need
> to replicate
> > from the central server to the branches. Other tables are
> centralised from
> > the branches into one totalling table at the centre. A few
> tables need to
> > replicate in both directions.
>
>
> I'm working on some projects here with this very need (and same
> scale), and I
> plan to use londiste (master/slaves asynchronous solution) replication
> solution, which I already use in production on some other project.
>
> The fact is that we want the "branches" to still be fully
> available in case of
> network or central server failure, so we don't buy into synchronous
> replication; which is not available yet into PostgreSQL as far as
> I know,
> even if one of the basics building-block alternatives is provided
> into -core,
> namely Two Phase Commit.
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/sql-prepare-transaction.html
>
> You'll find londiste documentation at both following places, the
> latter is
> up-to-date with last 2.1.6 release, the former I'm not sure about it.
> http://skytools.projects.postgresql.org/doc/
> http://pgsql.tapoueh.org/skytools/
>
> Hope this helps, regards,
>
> --
> dim
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jimmy Choi | 2008-04-16 15:02:21 | "vacuum" and "cluster" |
Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2008-04-16 14:47:19 | Re: Master-master replication with PostgreSQL |