| From: | Robert Lor <Robert(dot)Lor(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Bräutigam <thomas(dot)braeutigam(at)nexustelecom(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Jignesh K(dot) Shah" <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
| Subject: | Re: Postgres and SUN |
| Date: | 2008-04-03 17:27:35 |
| Message-ID: | 47F51387.9050409@sun.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Thomas,
Thomas Bräutigam wrote:
> Hi Zmi,
>
> Okay thanks for that advice. Sorry its my first day on a mailing list.
>
> But do Postgres have a special recommendation which SUN equipment runs perfect with a Postgres Database?
>
> A time for a query over 30 seconds I would say is to long. So the machine should be fast enough to handle it in 10-20 Seconds. Price for the Machine doesn’t matter at all. The machine should just fit and can handle this kinda huge database.
>
Sun has published a benchmark on the Sun Fire T2000 Server and the
results are published here
http://www.spec.org/jAppServer2004/results/res2007q3/jAppServer2004-20070703-00073.html
Jignesh has also done tests on the following AMD and Intel systems, and
I believe the results were quite good.
http://www.sun.com/servers/entry/x4200/
http://www.sun.com/servers/x64/x4450/
Regards,
-Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Benjamin Krajmalnik | 2008-04-04 01:39:11 | Re: Windows max concurrent connections |
| Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2008-04-03 16:47:17 | Re: Windows max concurrent connections |