From: | Thomas Bräutigam <thomas(dot)braeutigam(at)nexustelecom(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <Robert(dot)Lor(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
Cc: | <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Jignesh K(dot) Shah" <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
Subject: | Re: Postgres and SUN |
Date: | 2008-04-04 07:47:34 |
Message-ID: | 46F5921DF52F6E40860287B30CADADC7776B1B@EROS.nexus-ag.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Hi Robert
What do you think about the SUN T5120 or T5220 with a Postgres Database?
Cheers Thomas
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert(dot)Lor(at)Sun(dot)COM [mailto:Robert(dot)Lor(at)Sun(dot)COM]
Sent: Donnerstag, 3. April 2008 19:28
To: Thomas Bräutigam
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org; Jignesh K. Shah
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Postgres and SUN
Thomas,
Thomas Bräutigam wrote:
> Hi Zmi,
>
> Okay thanks for that advice. Sorry its my first day on a mailing list.
>
> But do Postgres have a special recommendation which SUN equipment runs perfect with a Postgres Database?
>
> A time for a query over 30 seconds I would say is to long. So the machine should be fast enough to handle it in 10-20 Seconds. Price for the Machine doesn't matter at all. The machine should just fit and can handle this kinda huge database.
>
Sun has published a benchmark on the Sun Fire T2000 Server and the results are published here http://www.spec.org/jAppServer2004/results/res2007q3/jAppServer2004-20070703-00073.html
Jignesh has also done tests on the following AMD and Intel systems, and I believe the results were quite good.
http://www.sun.com/servers/entry/x4200/
http://www.sun.com/servers/x64/x4450/
Regards,
-Robert
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Julius Tuskenis | 2008-04-04 08:04:59 | Re: store different tables in different locations |
Previous Message | Duan Ligong | 2008-04-04 07:32:23 | Re: store different tables in different locations |