Tom Lane wrote:
> Mark Mielke <mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc> writes:
>
>> I'm noticing a massive reduction in on disk storage required for my
>> database that I believe is primarily attributable due to Tom's reduced
>> overhead for short strings.
>>
>
> Twasn't my work; Greg Stark gets most of the credit for that one, and
> you might be seeing some benefit from Heikki's work to cut the tuple
> header size too.
>
Oops. You are right. Thanks Greg and Heikki! Whatever you did works
great! :-)
Cheers,
mark
--
Mark Mielke <mark(at)mielke(dot)cc>