Re: insert ... delete ... returning ... ?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mark Mielke <mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc>
Cc: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgresql-Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: insert ... delete ... returning ... ?
Date: 2008-02-25 06:22:07
Message-ID: 12952.1203920527@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Mark Mielke <mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc> writes:
> I'm noticing a massive reduction in on disk storage required for my
> database that I believe is primarily attributable due to Tom's reduced
> overhead for short strings.

Twasn't my work; Greg Stark gets most of the credit for that one, and
you might be seeing some benefit from Heikki's work to cut the tuple
header size too.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Dunstan 2008-02-25 09:06:09 Re: pg_dump additional options for performance
Previous Message Pavan Deolasee 2008-02-25 05:39:32 Re: pg_dump additional options for performance