From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> |
Cc: | Jean-Paul Argudo <jean-paul(at)postgresqlfr(dot)org>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, cert(at)lists(dot)postgresqlcertification(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL Certification |
Date: | 2008-02-04 02:21:10 |
Message-ID: | 47A67696.1040501@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general |
JPA, Greg,
> The logical leap from there is to not certify companies except
> indirectly via this mechanism, which solves the whole stack of logistics
> problems that would otherwise come from trying to figure out just what a
> company certification even means. Saying "you can list certification
> for a company only in the context of listing your certified workers"
> makes the issue go away.
I have to side with Greg here. However, I also think that I should join
the certification mailing list and argue it out there.
--Josh
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2008-02-04 03:12:37 | Re: PostgreSQL Certification |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2008-02-04 02:18:18 | Re: New Shipment of Elephant Pins |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2008-02-04 03:12:37 | Re: PostgreSQL Certification |
Previous Message | Myk | 2008-02-04 02:05:47 | Re: Function returning subset of columns from table (return type) |