From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Jean-Paul Argudo <jean-paul(at)postgresqlfr(dot)org>, cert(at)lists(dot)postgresqlcertification(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL Certification |
Date: | 2008-02-04 03:12:37 |
Message-ID: | 200802040412.38216.peter_e@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general |
Greg Smith wrote:
> If you just force the program to be open this issue largely resolves
> itself. Companies that want to advertise their certification should have
> to list their certified members. Leave it up to the buyer as to whether
> they have enough of them, why should the certification authority be
> needlessly complicated by worrying about this sort of thing?
Most companies don't want to make their employee list public.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-02-04 04:05:53 | Re: PostgreSQL Certification |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2008-02-04 02:21:10 | Re: PostgreSQL Certification |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gurjeet Singh | 2008-02-04 03:13:23 | Reverse key index |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2008-02-04 02:21:10 | Re: PostgreSQL Certification |