Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL RPM Yum repository is available]

From: Guillaume Smet <guillaume_ml(at)smet(dot)org>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL RPM Yum repository is available]
Date: 2008-01-09 08:58:06
Message-ID: 47848C9E.80209@smet.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Magnus Hagander a écrit :
> If that's so, then that's the problem. Because the first copy of this email
> was received *way* earlier than that. As in right after it was sent. Maybe
> you can get a bunch of the original headers fromt he MBOX files in the
> archives? (they have only one copy of it, but I'll bet it shows a
> completely different delivery time)

Just to be sure everyone noticed that, there were two different emails,
one announcing the RPM buildfarm and one announcing the Yum repo.

Is anyone interested in the headers of the last time the problem occurs
(errata to beta4 release)? I just digged in my archives and I still have
them if anyone is interested.

This time, I got each email once so I can't help.

--
Guillaume

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2008-01-09 09:01:49 Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL RPM Yum repository is available]
Previous Message Guillaume Smet 2008-01-09 08:52:14 Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL RPM Yum repository is available]