| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Guillaume Smet <guillaume_ml(at)smet(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL RPM Yum repository is available] |
| Date: | 2008-01-09 09:01:49 |
| Message-ID: | 20080109090149.GC25870@svr2.hagander.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 09:52:14AM +0100, Guillaume Smet wrote:
> Magnus Hagander a écrit :
> >If that's so, then that's the problem. Because the first copy of this email
> >was received *way* earlier than that. As in right after it was sent. Maybe
> >you can get a bunch of the original headers fromt he MBOX files in the
> >archives? (they have only one copy of it, but I'll bet it shows a
> >completely different delivery time)
>
> Be careful because there were 2 different emails:
> [ANNOUNCE] Announcing PostgreSQL RPM Buildfarm
> [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL RPM Yum repository is available
>
> Just to be sure everyone did notice that because they were highly
> related. The last time we had the problem, I got the message three times
> but this time I have only one copy of each.
Oops. I'm totally guilty of that. That means I didn't get four copies, but
I certainly got more than one of at least one of them. But you can probably
scratch my comment about the long time difference.
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-01-09 11:29:26 | Best Database |
| Previous Message | Guillaume Smet | 2008-01-09 08:58:06 | Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL RPM Yum repository is available] |