From: | Chris <dmagick(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Geoffrey <lists(at)serioustechnology(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Memory on 32bit machine |
Date: | 2008-01-08 02:10:12 |
Message-ID: | 4782DB84.6090303@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Geoffrey wrote:
> mljv(at)planwerk6(dot)de wrote:
>> Am Montag, 7. Januar 2008 12:56 schrieb Florian Weimer:
>>>> Or would you rather vote for 64bit because there are no problems
>>>> anymore and postgresql runs fine on 64bit debian.
>>> We haven't run into any trouble with iptables on Debian etch, running
>>> on amd64 hardware. But we use only fairly standard iptables
>>> functionality.
>>
>> ok, thanks for this information. It was sarge when i used iptables
>> with 64bit kernel and it even failed to start up.so i'll might give
>> 64bit another try.
>>
>> Are there any other recommendations whether to use 64bit or 32bit OS
>> with postgresql? I just want to use 64bit if it as stable as 32bit.
>
> I'm curious as to why you would run iptables on a database server. My
> expectation would be that your database machine would be behind a
> dedicated firewall.
Why not? Security in layers and all that. :)
--
Postgresql & php tutorials
http://www.designmagick.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-01-08 02:19:33 | Re: Performance problem. Could it be related to 8.3-beta4? |
Previous Message | Clodoaldo | 2008-01-08 01:15:53 | Re: Performance problem. Could it be related to 8.3-beta4? |