Re: Memory on 32bit machine

From: Geoffrey <lists(at)serioustechnology(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Memory on 32bit machine
Date: 2008-01-07 14:07:36
Message-ID: 47823228.6000509@serioustechnology.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

mljv(at)planwerk6(dot)de wrote:
> Am Montag, 7. Januar 2008 12:56 schrieb Florian Weimer:
>>> Or would you rather vote for 64bit because there are no problems
>>> anymore and postgresql runs fine on 64bit debian.
>> We haven't run into any trouble with iptables on Debian etch, running
>> on amd64 hardware. But we use only fairly standard iptables
>> functionality.
>
> ok, thanks for this information. It was sarge when i used iptables with 64bit
> kernel and it even failed to start up.so i'll might give 64bit another try.
>
> Are there any other recommendations whether to use 64bit or 32bit OS with
> postgresql? I just want to use 64bit if it as stable as 32bit.

I'm curious as to why you would run iptables on a database server. My
expectation would be that your database machine would be behind a
dedicated firewall.

--
Until later, Geoffrey

Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
- Benjamin Franklin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2008-01-07 14:46:19 Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4
Previous Message Dennis Brakhane 2008-01-07 13:36:21 Can a stored procedure that creates a temp table be declared STABLE?