| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Slow PITR restore |
| Date: | 2007-12-12 15:36:37 |
| Message-ID: | 47600005.8040506@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 22:21 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>>> ... Now I understand that restoring log files can be slow but this is a big
>>> machine.
>> Yeah, restoring is known to be less than speedy, because essentially
>> zero optimization work has been done on it.
>
> If there was a patch to improve this, would it be applied to 8.3?
>
Sheesh Simon you are really pushing this release :). I would love to see
a patch to resolve this, especially since it appears to be a fairly
glaring oversight. We can't really expect people to use PITR if they new
it would take hours to recover even on the size of machine I was working on.
On the other hand... we are about to go to RC1 :)
Joshua D. Drake
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2007-12-12 15:37:55 | Re: Better alternative for Primary Key then serial?? |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-12-12 15:33:25 | Re: Southern California Linux Expo |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-12-12 15:43:56 | Re: VLDB Features |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-12-12 14:48:16 | Re: Slow PITR restore |