| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Slow PITR restore |
| Date: | 2007-12-12 14:48:16 |
| Message-ID: | 1197470896.4255.1539.camel@ebony.site |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 22:21 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > ... Now I understand that restoring log files can be slow but this is a big
> > machine.
>
> Yeah, restoring is known to be less than speedy, because essentially
> zero optimization work has been done on it.
If there was a patch to improve this, would it be applied to 8.3?
--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-12-12 15:10:42 | Re: Hijack! |
| Previous Message | Isak Hansen | 2007-12-12 14:43:30 | Re: index organized tables use case |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-12-12 15:36:37 | Re: Slow PITR restore |
| Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-12-12 13:22:03 | ScalarArrayOp advancing array keys |