From: | Matteo Beccati <php(at)beccati(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Better default_statistics_target |
Date: | 2007-11-21 16:30:37 |
Message-ID: | 47445D2D.1060305@beccati.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Hi,
> - why did we pick 100 for the LIKE operator?
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-09/msg01715.php
> - should we document the better selectivity for LIKE operators at 100?
Probably... it I'm the only one who knows about it ;)
--
Matteo Beccati
Openads - http://www.openads.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-11-21 16:39:14 | Re: plperl failure on OS X 10.5(.1) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-11-21 16:27:14 | Re: Postgres 8.3 archive_command |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-11-21 22:36:26 | Re: [HACKERS] wrong behavior using to_char() again |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-11-21 16:17:05 | Re: wrong behavior using to_char() again |