"Reuven M. Lerner" <reuven(at)lerner(dot)co(dot)il> writes:
> I've managed to convince each of these clients that PostgreSQL is
> indeed a reliable database. But I I still have to wonder: Is there
> any truth to these statements? Is it simply FUD, or was PostgreSQL
> once prone to data corruption?
Before about 7.0, I'd have said it was a reasonable complaint.
We've done an awful lot to improve reliability over the last few
releases.
regards, tom lane