Re: New pgsql-advocacy description

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:42:38 +0000
> Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>
>> Robert Treat wrote:
>>> On Friday 16 November 2007 12:20, Dave Page wrote:
>>>> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>>>> Marc (or maybe Dave) should be able to sync up the description.
>>>> Added to the archives home page, and the top of the indexes for the
>>>> list. Should hit the frontend site next time a sync happens.
>>>>
>>> Any chance the archives code will ever get put under svn? I
>>> understand why we can't do autobuild like with www, but allowing
>>> others to get ahead of changes/fixes seems like a bonus...
>>>
>> We probably could now we're using SVN. I was putting it off until I'd
>> finished the new archives code, but I haven't been able to touch that
>> in a couple of months now.
>
> Should I just push a branch?

Eh? The code's not even in SVN yet. My point is that with SVN we can
delete the old code and replace it with the new much more cleanly than
we could with CVS, thus it's no big deal to add whats there now and
replace it later.

Or are you suggesting a dev branch for me to put the new code in so
others can work on it until it's ready?

/D