From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: New pgsql-advocacy description |
Date: | 2007-11-16 19:57:20 |
Message-ID: | 20071116115720.39699353@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:55:46 +0000
Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> > Should I just push a branch?
>
> Eh? The code's not even in SVN yet. My point is that with SVN we can
> delete the old code and replace it with the new much more cleanly than
> we could with CVS, thus it's no big deal to add whats there now and
> replace it later.
>
> Or are you suggesting a dev branch for me to put the new code in so
> others can work on it until it's ready?
Well that would work too :) what I was suggesting is getting the
current archives code into the pgweb svn as a branch.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> /D
>
- --
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHPfYiATb/zqfZUUQRAsYdAJ0crAAAt8BZuvGzKok9HNQIyt9UcwCeIEIt
4nrK69BmHKLOpnxbZNph1zQ=
=qos8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2007-11-16 20:00:44 | Re: duplicate entry on: http://www.postgresql.org/support/professional_support_northamerica |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2007-11-16 19:55:46 | Re: New pgsql-advocacy description |