From: | "Jignesh K(dot) Shah" <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: LDC - Load Distributed Checkpoints with PG8.3b2 on Solaris |
Date: | 2007-11-15 14:03:09 |
Message-ID: | 473C519D.9060805@sun.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Yes I separate out as follows:
PGDATA + 1 TABLE which needs to be cached (also workaround CLOG read
problem)
LOGS
DATABASE TABLES
DATABASE INDEX
to get a good view of IOs out
I have full_page_writes=off in my settings
I dont see spikes of increase on WAL during checkpoints (maybe due to my
setting) but the constant load which is in the range of about
2-2.5MB/sec which is not low but my load is high.
In my current run I do have async wal on with wal_writer_delay=100ms and
commit_delay off.
-Jignesh
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Jignesh K. Shah wrote:
>> Since its really writes that I am having trouble.. the auto vacuum
>> message tells me 11 pages were removed and so many tuples were
>> removed.. I am guessing its writes.
>
> Do you keep track of I/O to WAL and data separately? WAL bandwidth
> will spike up when a checkpoint starts, because of full page writes.
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Trevor Talbot | 2007-11-15 14:20:45 | Re: Simplifying Text Search |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2007-11-15 13:01:58 | Re: psql -f doesn't complain about directories |