Re: LDC - Load Distributed Checkpoints with PG8.3b2 on Solaris

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Jignesh K(dot) Shah" <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)Sun(dot)COM>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: LDC - Load Distributed Checkpoints with PG8.3b2 on Solaris
Date: 2007-11-15 09:36:21
Message-ID: 473C1315.6020006@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jignesh K. Shah wrote:
> Since its really writes that I am having trouble.. the auto vacuum
> message tells me 11 pages were removed and so many tuples were
> removed.. I am guessing its writes.

Do you keep track of I/O to WAL and data separately? WAL bandwidth will
spike up when a checkpoint starts, because of full page writes.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2007-11-15 09:40:25 Re: LDC - Load Distributed Checkpoints with PG8.3b2 on Solaris
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-11-15 06:05:28 Re: Spinlock backoff algorithm